Law is revised to a powerful thing rather than what was able to be used is accompanied by penal regulations only within individual use until now.Although the utterance [ do / too much ] ? is also seen by the net user, from him, the utterance in the committee of a journalist "Mr. Tsuda daisuke" famous on a network attracts attention.
The preceding paragraph, self-introduction
You need your help well.
It is called Tsuda.
I am sorry, thank you for having such imprudent blond hair first invited to such a place.
us -- well -- me -- although it is coming as a representative with an Internet user association as an individual, if it says in a certain sense, things are very difficult in telling on behalf of the Internet user's voice.
Since there are already 95 million Internet users now, while they say that they are the information environments which most people already use, can say that no such people's voice is paid by proxy, but. however, it being a certain kind of one voice of the Internet user, and, in the way of the Agency for Cultural Affairs from 2006 to 2009 which the I individual came out and was peevish, and have been concerned very deeply with this problem in fact, furthermore opted for the Copyright Act revision in 2000 from the first, there being a council called a private-sound-recording recording subcommittee, and it coming out and being peevish, and I being the member and, if [ if allowed to speak today from the position that it is also as one person who determines illegalization before this download illegalization and criminal-punishment-izing and who was engaged there as a committee, and in which it has been engaged very much in this problem for about six years ] -- I consider.
first -- this problem -- if it expresses from a position previously -- me -- an individual and the Internet user association are positions of the contrary in criminal-punishment-izing.
It is such points in the data which you, Mr. Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and I submitted this time while [ at which this argument is done from 2006 in 2009 ] just arguing in the council of the Agency for Cultural Affairs feeling uneasy, and non- which I remember although it thinks that there are well various views.
It has argued about the point feeling uneasy -- whether a user without a crime will be arrested by mistake.
Well, since extension of term of the place which will be decided in one year will have been carried out for three years if true, the thought of having argued fairly and seriously is also in me for three years.
As a situation of the argument in 2009, balance of criminal punishment is bad from 2006.
coming out -- me, although the opposite position whether it was a thing without the necessity that an individual illegalizes download in the council was taken, It is [ what / like / a thing / protection / to the point feeling uneasy, because ] whether by arguing about it and scrutinizing it by you by still taking out various points feeling uneasy, while arguing, it cared fairly.
It remembers to of well as it is having become an appropriate conclusion.
Although my intensity is very strong on this problem in that meaning, When it is referred to as illegalizing to just download music and an animation for the illegal file of the じゃあ Internet from 2006 then in 2009, naturally whether criminal punishment is attached and how it is should also have gone up to the argument, it be peevish, and come up for discussion.
it is then -- me, although I think Ikuno (it obtains) of Japan Phonograph Record Association of those days in the proposal that criminal punishment did not attach having come out into the secretariat and the argument although the individual was an opposite position, it is required that it should be heard and criminal punishment should be attached -- was that a record association naturally attaches criminal punishment from that time well as it is demanding?
if this comes out, Mr. Nobuhiro Nakayama who the halves in a committee are the Copyright Act-related persons concerned and the judicial officer persons concerned too, and is the first authority of the Copyright Act which was the chairman as to why it did not attach, although demanded is also peevish and criminal punishment probably is not attached.
When it comes out and why is said that it is attached, simply this, It is if attaching criminal punishment probably has too heavy the punishment to impose to the committed crime and the economical profit and loss spoiled there which a user individual downloads, Criminal punishment thinks then that not being attached was the view in which the judicial officer persons concerned who had participated then were probably common.
although it came out and the committee itself closed in 2009, subcommittee which deliberates after it the Copyright Act of the Copyright Act opened all the time every year according to usage is located in the Agency for Cultural Affairs, it comes out and is peevish, and, subcommittee, all committees are already the judicial officer persons involved in the Copyright Act.
Although the request with criminal-punishment-izing also in the inside of it although there is only a jurist fundamentally has gone up from the music industry and it naturally came up for discussion, if it is that this has bad balance, and it is denied and it results soon merely too.
and as for this, I hearing that almost all persons have bad balance, and it already, when it will come out and be peevish, you will leave it to this council too and the judicial officer persons involved in a certain seed Copyright Act will be left, if it says in such a sense Do I hear that it is a series of flows now that I hear that criminal punishment cannot be attached any longer, and legislation by House members is raised as a talk for about two years per here year, and it is going to argue and is just going to be approved now here since it has denied?
if [ merely / well / the judicial officer persons concerned / if saying / that that the point was denied has led also to the place which says why the Japan Federation of Bar Associations there is opposing also although the opinion of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations is expressed and it excels like the point / can understand ] -- I consider.
Although it thinks that a politician's teacher is serious, I want you to catch solemnly.
it comes out, it thinks that it is when considering this problem, and that the teachers' of the politician's, for whom I have had you already gather in this way now truly, work comes out and is peevish, comes out very very much, and is important, and I respect every day.
Since, as for this, I come to be truly concerned with this policy, this is also the true earnest thought currently considered, but. If it is said [ what ] after all whether be politician's teachers' work, by hearing the opinion of various far and near positions in having heard the opinion of the stakeholder from whom profits completely differ and from whom an interest differs, a certain meaning which considers law and the future of this country and makes the policy from a broad point of view -- do I think that a politician's teacher is media existence?
They are the media as mediation.
Although it is just going to say that something must be determined and advanced in some having been various, If it merely says on this problem, it will be peevish, when the problem of this problem, illegal download, especially punishment-izing is considered, are and it is peevish, and judicial officer-related [ many of ]. Does that I would like you to catch this solemnly as one fact consider opposing, if this has clearly bad balance?
this -- me -- the individual is very impressive -- in fact -- moreover, although it returns to the talk of the council in which I of private-sound-recording recording [ 2009 ] had participated since 2006, Although it was a strange talk well, it was a position in which I had 18 committee members and only one person was opposing about download illegalization.
As for this, if it does not illegalize any longer, it is a trend ( cause.) of an argument that it is probably unavoidable.
while being the way move in a certain direction, I was alone opposed, but pass the process that it comes out and is peevish and become a form which still explores common ground 、 to some extent in having argued in it, and reach a conclusion and it becomes Copyright Act revision -- I think that it was.
it is then -- the teacher of the lawyer near entertainment comes out and is rather sulky about the judicial officer persons concerned, and although illegalization of download agreed with the person, the committees opposing [ a certain meaning No. 1 ] just, This time, the direction which was [ / which is called this criminal-punishment-izing ] most opposed to a certain kind and me also stated opposing clearly, if it is going too far too much in the meeting of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations about this criminal-punishment-izing, and came.
You should argue on the right recognition.http://www.akiyan.com/blog/archives/2012/06/tsuda-daisuke-view-for-illegal-download.html
the same place will describe the same opinion as this person by no means also in such a sense very much to say -- me -- he is also an individual, although the very impressive thing was a meeting of the former Japan Federation of Bar Associations, liking to come out and be peevish and to recognize such a very big problem anew to a certain meaning and politicians, this problem -- legislation by House members -- from the first -- it comes out also including the circumstances of saying [ having been submitted by carrying out ], and it is the music industry, if it is peevish and is a part of specific industries and now -- only the opinion of the music industry being heard and by illegal download of the Internet now, There are results of an investigation of having suffered very serious damage and of having suffered about 680 billion yen damage, and, fundamentally, the results of an investigation themselves and indication whether the way is partial have also come out also from various scholars but from the first.
First of all, it is since it is in 1998 and CD is 600 billion then that Japan's CD sold most.
At the peak, 600 billion is falling rapidly and has fallen to 250 billion now.
Although a situation very serious in such meaning is known, Although 600 billion which has not sold to there CD which has not simply been sold once until now beyond it was a peak, Itself that the loss of a thing called 680 billion beyond it has come out by illegal download, first of all, as a number, I am not too virtual -- it is -- I considering to to say, and it coming out and being peevish based on such partial results of an investigation of a certain kind, being such Parliaments, and, Since I think that it is a role of Parliament this checks and argue seriously in it about the partial results of an investigation, there is a very slightly regrettable portion in progressing without it check.
but it comes out and is peevish, CD does not sell, and that the music industry is troubled by illegal download can also understand me very much.
I myself already look at the music industry in the position of a journalist for work all the time for ten years or more, and I can also understand it very much.
No comments:
Post a Comment